Physiogenomic method for predicting drug metabolism reserve for antidepressants and stimulants

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are compositions and methods relevant to a novel Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype to determine the metabolic capacity of a human individual. The Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype allows the determination of the innate metabolic capacity of the patient relevant to antidepressant and stimulant treatment and can be predicted and diagnosed simply from a blood sample. In the disclosed method, an individual is genotyped for a plurality of polymorphisms in a gene encoding CYP2C9, a gene encoding CYP2C19 and a gene encoding CYP2D6, and the genotypes are used to produce four novel indices, which relate to the metabolic capacity of the human individual.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.12/910,165, filed Oct. 22, 2010, which is a nonprovisional of U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/254,767, filed Oct. 26, 2010, which areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is currently the leading cause ofdisability in North America as well as other countries and, according tothe WHO, may become the second leading cause of disability worldwide(after heart disease) by the year 2020. Over the years, the elusive andhighly variable nature of psychiatric disorders has led to drug therapytreatment that largely relies on empiricism to ascertain individualpatient differences. This empirical approach has resulted in a high rateof refractory and adverse responses to drug therapies, renderingtreatment of MDD one of the most significant challenges in psychiatry.

Both published literature studies and clinical experience reveal greatvariability in an individual's response to psychotropic drug treatmentwith regard to drug metabolism, side effects and efficacy. Thisvariability is in part attributable to genetic differences that resultin slowed or accelerated oxidation of many psychotropic drugsmetabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzyme system in theliver. In particular, clinically relevant variants have been identifiedfor the isoenzymes coded by the CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes. Wilethe pharmacogenetic significance of CYP2C9-deficient alleles is not asprominent in psychiatry as that of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, it is known thatthe gene represents a minor metabolic pathway for some antidepressants.Therefore, polymorphisms in CYP2C9 may be important in psychiatricpatients deficient for other CYP450 enzymatic activities. Some of thepotential consequences of polymorphic drug metabolism are extendedpharmacological effect, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), lack of prodrugactivation, drug toxicity, increased or decreased effective dose,metabolism by alternative deleterious pathways and exacerbated drug-druginteractions. CYP450 isoenzymes are also involved in the metabolism ofendogenous substrates, including neurotransmitter amines, and have beenimplicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. CYP2D6 activity hasbeen associated with personality traits and CYP2C9 to MDD.

The CYP2D6 gene product metabolizes several antipsychotic (e.g.,aripiprazole and risperidone) and antidepressants (e.g., duloxetine,paroxetine and venlafaxine). CYP2D6 is highly polymorphic. More than 60alleles and more than 130 genetic variations have been described forthis gene, located on chromosome 22q13. Clinically, the most significantphenotype is the null metabolizer, which has no CYP2D6 activity becauseit has two nonfunctional CYP2D6 alleles or is missing the genealtogether. The prevalence of null metabolizers is approximately 7% inCaucasians and 1-3% in other races. Gene duplications of CYP2D6 that maylead to an ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM) phenotype are also clinicallysignificant. A recent worldwide study suggested that up to 40% ofindividuals in some North African and more than 20% in Australianpopulations are CYP2D6 UMs. In a 2006 US survey, the prevalence ofCYP2D6 UMs was 1-2% in Caucasians and African-Americans. CYP2C9 islocated on chromosome 10q24, and its gene product is involved in themetabolism of several important psychoactive substances (e.g.,fluoxetine, phenytoin, sertraline and tetrahydrocannabinol). It has beenreported that CYP2C9 activity is modulated by endogenous substrates suchas adrenaline and serotonin. CYP2C19 is also located on chromosome10q24, but in linkage equilibrium with CYP2C9. Its gene product isinvolved in the metabolism of various antidepressants (e.g., citalopramand escitalopram). For some psychotropics, a cumulative deficit in drugmetabolism resulting from multigene polymorphisms in CYP2D6, CYP2C9 andCYP2C19 may be clinically significant. For example, gene products forCYP2C19 and CYP2D6 provide joint drug-metabolism pathways for varioustricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline and imipramine). Giventhat CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genes are not linked physically orgenetically, their polymorphisms would be expected to segregateindependently in populations.

Pharmacogenetics is a discipline that attempts to correlate specificgene variations with responses to particular drugs. Such DNA-guidedpharmacotherapy would be potentially cost effective and could sparepatients from unwanted side effects by matching each with the mostsuitable, individualized drug and dosing regimen at initiation ofpharmacotherapy. There have been strategies personalizing dosing forpsychiatric drugs according to algorithms derived from studies of bloodlevels. Beyond pharmacogenetics, it has become apparent that therapeuticindex is a necessary concept in understanding how CYP450 polymorphismmay influence personalized prescription.

A 1998 meta-analysis of 39 prospective studies in US hospitals estimatedthat 106,000 Americans die annually from ADRs. Adverse drug events arealso common (50 per 1000 person years) among ambulatory patients,particularly the elderly on multiple medications. The 38% of eventsclassified as ‘serious’ are also the most preventable. It is now clearthat virtually every pathway of drug metabolism, transport and action issusceptible to gene variation. Within the top 200 selling prescriptiondrugs, 59% of the 27 most frequently cited in ADR studies aremetabolized by at least one enzyme known to have gene variants that codefor reduced or nonfunctional proteins.

In psychiatry, the high carrier prevalence of deficient CYP450 alleleshas significant implications for healthcare management. Uninformedprescribing of psychotropics to patients with highly compromisedbiochemical activity for the CYP450 isoenzymes, may expose 50% ofpatients to preventable severe side effects. If these patients werecarriers of gene polymorphisms resulting in deficient psychotropicmetabolism, their risk of adverse drug effects would substantiallyincrease. Were DNA typing to be performed after development of drugresistance or intolerance, such information could guide subsequentpharmacotherapy and assist in diagnosing drug-induced side effects. Thevalue of DNA typing for diagnosing severe drug side effects andtreatment resistance has been documented in various case reports.Optimally, DNA typing could be performed prior to drug prescription inorder to optimize therapy at the outset of psychotropic management.

While it is well known that interindividual variation in drug metabolismis highly dependent on inherited gene polymorphisms, the debateregarding the role of genotyping in clinical practice continues. Theutility of the system described herein is to provide clinically relevantindices of drug metabolism status based on combinatorial genotypes ofCYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. The combinatorial genotype so derived istermed the Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype.

SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a composition comprises, consists essentially of, orconsists of a plurality of marker probes or amplification primers thatdetect or amplify a plurality of polymorphisms in a gene encoding CYP2C9(SEQ ID NO:1), a gene encoding CYP2C19 (SEQ ID NO:2)and a gene encodingCYP2D6 (SEQ ID NO:3), comprising all of the following markers:

Gene Allele Nucleotide Change CYP2C9 *1 None *2 430C > T *3 1075A > C *41076T > C *5 1080C > G *6 818delA CYP2C19 *1 None *2 681G > A *3 636G >A *4 1A > G *5 1297C > T *6 395G > A *7 IVS5 + 2T > A *8 358T > C CYP2D6*1 None *1XN Gene copy number (N) *2 1661G > C *2a −1584C > G *2XN Genecopy number (N) *3 2549delA *4 1846G > A *4XN Gene copy number (N) *5Gene deletion *6 1707delT *7 2935A > C *8 1758G > T *9 2615 2617delAAG*10 100C > T *11 883G > C *12 124G > A *14 1758G > A *15 137_138InsT *171023C > T *41 2988G > A

In another embodiment, a method of determining the metabolic capacity ofa human individual relevant to antidepressant and stimulant treatment,comprises:

genotyping the individual to produce a combinatorial genotype, whereinthe combinatorial genotype comprises both gene copies of each gene ofthe plurality of marker probes in the foregoing table;

calculating one or more index scores selected from the group consistingof the metabolic reserve index, the metabolic alteration index, theallele alteration index and the gene alteration index, based on theTable, wherein the metabolic reserve index, the metabolic alterationindex, the allele alteration index are scored 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 or 2 foreach copy of each gene individually according to the Table, and the genealteration index is scored 0 or 1 based on the combination of allelesfor each marker, and all scores are added to produce the index score;and

Metabolic Metabolic Allele CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6 Reserve AlterationAlteration *1 *1 *1, *2 1 0 0 *2 *9, *10, *17, *41 0.5 0.5 1 *2a 1.5 0.51 *1XN, *2XN 2 1 1 *3, *4, *5, *6 *2, *3, *4, *5, *3, *4, *6, *7, *8, 01 1 *6, *7, *8 *11, *12, *14, *15, *5, *4XN Gene CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6Alteration *1*1 *1*1 *1*1, *1*2, *2*2 0 All other allele All otherallele All other allele 1 combinations combinations combinations

comparing the one or more index scores for the individual to adistribution of index scores for a population to determine the metaboliccapacity of the human individual relevant to antidepressant andstimulant treatment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 shows the frequencies of polymorphisms across CYP2C9, CYP2C19 andCYP2D6 for 577 psychiatric patients.

FIG. 2 shows the histogram for the Metabolic Reserve Index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 3 shows the histogram for the Metabolic alteration index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 4 shows the histogram for the Allele Alteration Index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 5 shows the histogram for the Gene Alteration Index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 6 shows the metabolic curve for the Metabolic Reserve Index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 7 shows the metabolic curve for the Metabolic alteration index for577 psychiatric patients.

FIG. 8 shows the metabolic curve for the Allele Alteration Index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 9 shows the metabolic curve for the Gene Alteration Index for 577psychiatric patients.

FIG. 10 shows the histogram by percentage for the Metabolic ReserveIndex for 92 cardiovascular patients and 577 psychiatric patients.

FIG. 11 shows the histogram by percentage for the Metabolic alterationindex for 92 cardiovascular patients and 577 psychiatric patients.

FIG. 12 shows the histogram by percentage for the Allele AlterationIndex for 92 cardiovascular patients and 577 psychiatric patients.

FIG. 13 shows the histogram by percentage for the Gene Alteration Indexfor 92 cardiovascular patients and 577 psychiatric patients.

FIG. 14 shows the histogram by percentage for the Gene Alteration Indexfor 92 cardiovascular patients and 73 referred psychiatric outpatients.

FIG. 15 depicts four physiogenomic plots that correlate length of staywith the four Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indices of 150hospitalized psychiatric patients.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein are compositions and methods relevant to a novel DrugMetabolism Reserve Physiotype to determine the metabolic capacity of ahuman individual. The Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype allows thedetermination of the innate metabolic capacity of the patient relevantto antidepressant and stimulant treatment and can be predicted anddiagnosed simply from a blood sample. Patients intolerant toantidepressant and stimulant drugs or refractory to treatment can betested for their drug metabolism capacity to benchmark their drugmetabolism reserve by genotyping three genes, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, andCYP2C19, as described herein. Therapy can be directed to drugs whoseprimary metabolic pathway is least deficient or normal in an individualpatient, thus markedly improving the safety and efficacy ofpharmacotherapy.

The Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype assays a total of 34 alleles forCYP450 (Cytochrome P450) genes CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. Thecorresponding hepatic isoenzymes metabolize widely utilizedneuropsychiatric drugs. These isoenzymes are highly polymorphic in genesequence and protein structure. Their resultant variable biochemicalproperties substantially alter individual patient drug response. Table 1provides the 34 gene variants in the ensemble. In one embodiment, acomposition comprises all of the markers in Table 1. In anotherembodiment, a composition consists essentially of the markers inTable 1. In yet another embodiment, a composition consists of themarkers in Table 1.

TABLE 1 CYP450 variants Gene Allele Nucleotide Change Effect CYP2C9 *1None Wild-Type *2 430C > T R144C *3 1075A > C I359L *4 1076T > C I359T*5 1080C > G D360E *6 818delA Frame shift CYP2C19 *1 None Wild-Type *2681G > A Splicing defect *3 636G > A W212X *4 1A > G GTG initiationcodon *5 1297C > T R433W *6 395G > A R132Q *7 IVS5 + 2T > A Splicingdefect *8 358T > C W120R CYP2D6 *1 None Wild-Type *1XN Gene copy number(N) Locus expanded *2 1661G > C None *2a −1584C > G Promoter *2XN Genecopy number (N) Locus expanded *3 2549delA Frameshift *4 1846G > ASplicing defect *4XN Gene copy number (N) Locus expanded *5 Genedeletion Locus deleted *6 1707delT Frameshift *7 2935A > C H324P *81758G > T G169X *9 2615 2617delAAG K281del *10 100C > T P34S *11 883G >C Splicing defect *12 124G > A G42R *14 1758G > A G169R *15 137_138InsTFrameshift *17 1023C > T T107I *41 2988G > A Splicing defect For eachgene, allele *1 is also referred to as Wild-Type (WT) CYP2C9 (SEQ ID NO:1; Genbank accession no. NM_000771.3, NP_000762) CYP2C19 (SEQ ID NO: 2;Genbank accession no. NM_000769, NP_000760) CYP2D6 (SEQ ID NO: 3;Genbank accession no. NM_000106, NP_000097.2, isoform 1)

In order to determine the novel indices described herein, the types andcarrier prevalences of Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotypes in MajorDepressive Disorder (MDD) patients were compared to a control group ofnon-psychiatrically ill, medical outpatients. The utility of the indiceswas confirmed through a case control study conducted using 73psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with depression and referred to atertiary center, The Institute of Living (Hartford, Conn. USA), fortreatment resistance or intolerable side effects to psychotropic drugs.The controls were 120 cardiovascular patients from Hartford Hospitalbeing treated for dyslipidemia but otherwise healthy and notpsychiatrically ill. Within the psychiatric population, 57% ofindividuals were carriers of non wild-type alleles for 2-3 genes,compared to 36% in the control population (p<0.0001). The balance, 43%in the psychiatric population and 64% in the control, were carriers ofnon wild-type alleles for 0-1 genes.

In one embodiment, a method of determining the metabolic capacity of ahuman individual relevant to antidepressant and stimulant treatmentincludes determining both gene copies of each gene of the plurality ofmarker probes described herein in Table 1. The genotype is referred toas a combinatorial genotype as is it includes data for a combination ofgenes.

Once the genotype of the human individual has been determined, an indexscore for the human individual is produced based on the genotype, andthe index score for the individual is then compared to a distribution ofindex scores for a population to predict the drug sensitivity for thehuman individual. In order to correlate quantitative values with anindividual's Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype, a series of novelindices were constructed. The following are the four indices:

-   1. The Metabolic Reserve Index-   2. The Metabolic Alteration Index-   3. The Allele Alteration Index (Number of non-WT alleles)-   4. The Gene Alteration Index (Number of non-WT gene loci)

All four indices assign a numeric value to CYP450 alleles depending ontheir altered phenotype. One, two, three or all four indices can becalculated for the individual and compared to the distribution of indexscores for a population. Table 2 shows how phenotypes and special casealleles are scored in the four different indices. The first three listedindices result from the summation of both gene copies in the CYP2C9,CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes. The final index considers both alleles pergene when scoring the genotype, with only an entirely wild-type genotypereceiving a score of “0” for that particular gene.

TABLE 2 Metabolic Metabolic Allele CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6 ReserveAlteration Alteration *1 *1 *1, *2 1 0 0 *2 *9, *10, *17, *41 0.5 0.5 1*2a 1.5 0.5 1 *1XN, *2XN 2 1 1 *3, *4, *5, *6 *2, *3, *4, *5, *3, *4,*6, *7, *8, 0 1 1 *6, *7, *8 *11, *12, *14, *15, *5, *4XN Gene CYP2C9CYP2C19 CYP2D6 Alteration *1 *1 *1 *1 *1*1, *1*2, *2*2 0 All otherallele All other allele All other allele 1 combinations combinationscombinations

The Metabolic Reserve Index:

The metabolic reserve index is designed to represent a series ofdiscrete CYP450 metabolic phenotypes from null (index=0) to ultra rapid(index>6). Since deficient and null alleles are scored lower thanwild-type alleles, the lower the index the greater the metabolicdeficiency. Similarly, as ultra-rapid alleles are scored higher thanwild-type, the presence of these alleles contributes a greater value tothe total metabolic index.

The Metabolic Alteration Index:

As shown in Table 1, the *1 allele in all three genes represents thewild-type phenotype and is associated with a normal metabolic capacity.The CYP2D6*2 allele is also considered to be wild-type. In this index,we capture any departure from wild-type alleles on any of the CYP2C9,CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes and score it according to the method in Table3. Given that the wild-type allele is assigned a score of “0”, anydeparture from wild-type, whether deficient or ultra-rapid is scoredhigher than zero as the index measures the absolute difference. Moresevere mutations are assigned a greater difference from the wild-typeallele.

The Allele Alteration Index (Number of Non-WT Alleles):

This index depends on a binary scoring of each individual allele. Inthis case, the index represents the sum of each of the six alleles,designated as either wild-type (*1, CYP2D6*2) or non wild-type (allother alleles). Thus, a score of “0” denotes a patient who is wild-typeacross all three genes, while a score of “6” indicates a patient withtwo non wild-type alleles are all three genes.

The Gene Alteration Index (Number of Non-WT Gene Loci):

The gene alteration index was created to capture a broad overview ofgene deficiencies, as opposed to allelic mutations. Like the allelealteration index, this scoring method utilizes binary scoring by scoringa gene carrying any non wild-type allele as “1” and a gene with twowild-type alleles as “0”. Therefore, an individual with a score of “3”has at least one non wild-type allele on all three genes, while anindividual with a score of “0” has no mutant alleles.

The calculated index scores for the individual are then compared to adistribution of index scores for a population to determine the metaboliccapacity of the human individual relevant to antidepressant andstimulant treatment.

In one embodiment, comparing the scores for the individual to apopulation is done using a metabolic ranking curve. The metabolicranking curves were derived using the same formula for all indices.

-   J=number of levels in index (length of N)

$\frac{{\sum\limits_{\{{i|{x_{i} < x}}\}}\; N_{i}} + {\frac{1}{2}{\sum\limits_{\{{{i|x_{i}} = x}\}}N_{i}}}}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}\; N_{i}}$

-   N=array of counts per index level-   x=individual index value

For instance, for an individual with a score of 5 on the metabolicreserve index:

j=11

N=[1, 6, 15, 23, 61, 84, 156, 96, 84, 37, 14]

x=5

Whereas a score of 2 on the metabolic alteration index:

J=9

N=[49, 79, 170, 118, 84, 39, 27, 18, 1]

x=2

The metabolic ranking curve calculates an individual's position (0 to100%) for a particular Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype index. Thiscurve uses the distribution of the 577 psychiatric subjects as a modelto determine where an individual fits in the index's distribution. Sucha placement will provide a clinician with a clearer comparative conceptof his/her patient's metabolic status in relation to the “average” (50%)individual. In conjunction with the raw index score, the physician willnow have a better understanding of a patient's absolute metabolicability in addition to their metabolic ability in relation to the samplepopulation.

In one embodiment, the human individual is a psychiatric patient such asa patient diagnosed with depression. In another embodiment, the patientis a patient with major depressive disorder. In yet another embodiment,the patient with major depressive disorder has been hospitalized for themajor depressive disorder.

In another embodiment, the method further comprises customizing a drugregimen for the psychiatric patient guided by the Drug MetabolismReserve Physiotype. This guidance will be achieved by evaluatingrelative contributions to Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indexvalues and rankings on a gene-by-gene basis, considering CYP2C9, CYP2C19and CYP2D6. Gene-specific index values associated with substantiallydecreased metabolic reserve, or greatly increased metabolic alterationwill lead to recommendations to avoid those drugs which are a substrateof the isoenzymes coded by the altered gene(s). An additional warningwill be provided if this altered isoenzyme constitutes the primary orsole metabolic pathway for that drug. Moderately decreased metabolicreserve or moderately increased metabolic alteration will prompt awarning to consider an altered dose and monitor with caution those drugsthat are a substrate of the altered isoenzymes. If a given gene'srelative contribution to the index values and ranking indicates that therespective isoenzyme is functional, drugs metabolized primarily by thatisoenzyme will be recommended to the physician. If the CYP2D6 indexcontribution value is determined to indicate ultra-rapid metabolism, thephysician will be notified that a normal dose may prove ineffective andthat there is an increased risk for drug-interactions if the patient isprescribed a pro-drug metabolized by CYP2D6 isoenzyme. In summary, theproportional contribution of each gene to the Drug Metabolism ReservePhysiotype indices will be used to guide physicians to chooseappropriate medications for their patients, which are metabolizedprimarily by isoenzymes for which the patient has the most metabolicreserve and least metabolic alteration.

In yet another embodiment, the method further comprises correlating theone or more index scores for the individual with a predicted length ofhospitalization. The method further optionally comprises customizing adrug regimen for the patient to reduce a length of hospitalization orreduce a risk of re-hospitalization. By providing pharmacogeneticguidance to physicians as described above, patients with lower metabolicreserve (associated with longer hospitalization) will receive treatmentregimens appropriate for their individual metabolic capacities. Based onour evidence, we predict that this guidance will lead to more efficientand effective treatment decisions, less adverse drug reactions andtherefore shorter hospitalizations.

In one embodiment, the index score is for the gene alteration index. Theinventors herein have unexpectedly discovered that the gene alterationindex score can be correlated with a new syndrome called DrugSensitivity Syndrome. When the gene alteration index score is equal to 3and the individual is diagnosed with Drug Sensitivity Syndrome.

Aspects of the method described herein may be embodied as a system, orcomputer program product. Accordingly, aspects may take the form of anentirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or anembodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may allgenerally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.”Furthermore, aspects may take the form of a computer program productembodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computerreadable program code embodied thereon. The computer readable medium maybe a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storagemedium. A computer readable storage medium is, for example, but notlimited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared,or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitablecombination of the foregoing. In addition, computer program code forcarrying out operations for aspects of the method disclosed herein maybe written in a combination of one or more programming languages. Theprogram code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on theuser's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user'scomputer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remotecomputer or server. The computer program instructions may also be loadedonto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or otherdevices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce acomputer implemented process such that the instructions which execute onthe computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limitingexamples:

EXAMPLE 1 Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype Indices with 577 PatientBlood Samples

Sample collection: 577 blood samples were collected over a period of 4years and 3 months beginning in July of 2005. 422 patient samples werereferred to the Laboratory of Personalized Health at Genomas for CYP450diagnostic genotyping as part of their clinical care because of efficacyor safety problems related to their medications. 150 samples came aspart of a collaborative study with The Institute of Living at HartfordHospital.

Patient cohorts: Of the 577 patients 57% are female and 43% are male.Patient date of birth was available for 572 and the average patient agewas 37.47 years old as of Sep. 29, 2009. No ethnic data yet.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) assays: CYP450 DNA typing data wereobtained for all 577 patients on CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. Bloodsamples were collected into tubes containing either EDTA or citrate andwere extracted from lymphocytes using the Qiagen EZ-1 robotic DNAisolation procedure. DNA typing was performed at the Genomas Laboratoryof Personalized Health (LPH) at Hartford Hospital. LPH is ahigh-complexity clinical DNA testing center licensed by the ConnecticutDepartment of Public Health (CL-0644) and certified by the Centers forMedicare and Medicaid Services (ID #07D1036625) under CLIA (ClinicalLaboratory Improvement Amendments).

TAG-IT™ Mutation Detection assays (Luminex Corporation, Austin Tex.)were utilized for DNA typing of 6, 8, and 20 alleles in genes CYP2C9,CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, respectively. These assays employed PolymeraseChain Reaction (PCR) to amplify selectively the desired gene withoutco-amplifying pseudogenes or other closely related sequences. Inaddition, the assay employs a PCR strategy to amplify fragmentscharacteristic of unique genomic rearrangements in order to detect thepresence of the deletion and duplication alleles in these genes. Theassays use multiplexed Allele Specific Primer Extension (ASPE) toidentify small nucleotide variations including single base changes anddeletions of one or 3 bases on the LUMINEX xMAP™ system (LuminexCorporation, Austin Tex.).

Allele categorization: We classified the alleles into clinicallydistinct categories for each of the three genes examined as null,deficient, functional, or ultra based on well-defined molecularproperties of the altered gene. Null alleles lack any enzymatic activitybecause the altered gene does not produce a functional protein. Suchnull alleles include gene deletions, frame shift mutations, stop codons,and splicing defects. Deficient alleles have sub-functional enzymaticactivity due to nucleotide substitutions resulting in amino acid changesin the protein, and these variants may manifest sub-normal enzymaticactivity for some drug substrates. The functional allele refers to thegenetic “wild-type”, the most common allele in the population withenzymatic activity considered normal. Ultra alleles exhibit increasedenzymatic activity as a consequence of either gene duplication or apromoter change. Table 1 lists alleles detected in this patient cohortand their functional classification. To determine the combinatorial nonwild-type frequency across all three genes examined, we used thegenotype data for each patient in each population and tallied the numberof subjects who had variant alleles in 3, 2, 1 or no genes.

Conventions for naming the alleles according to the Human CytochromeP450 (CYP) Allele Nomenclature Committee have been followed in thisresearch. Accordingly, all variant alleles contain nucleotide changesthat have been shown to affect transcription, splicing, translation,posttranscriptional or posttranslational modifications, result in atleast one amino acid change or alter the genomic structure of thechromosome locus by gene expansion or deletion.

Results: Among psychiatric patients, results from the LPH show asignificant prevalence of carriers of altered combinatorial genotypesfor CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes. FIG. 1 shows the frequencies ofpolymorphisms across multiple genes. Of the 577 patients genotyped, 49were wild-type for CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. 265 (47%) werepolymorphic on only one of the three genes. Of those 265, individualswith mutations on the CYP2D6 gene accounted for 186. Patients withpolymorphisms across two of the three genes made up 39% of thepopulation (227 individuals). Finally, 6% (36) samples had at least onenon wild-type allele in all three genes tested. These results are alsodisplayed as a histogram in FIG. 5 and correlate directly with the GeneAlteration Index.

FIGS. 2-5 are histograms of the 577 psychiatric patients that depict thedistributions and counts for each Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotypeindex, calculated in accordance with Table 2. FIG. 2 shows the histogramfor the Metabolic reserve index. The median index value is 5.0 and theupper-boundaries for the 1^(st) and 3^(rd) quartiles are 4.5 and 5.5,respectively. FIG. 3 is the Allele Alteration Index histogram. In thisdata set, the median value is 1.0 and the 1^(st) and 3^(rd) quartileboundaries are 1.0 and 2.0, respectively. The median values in FIG. 4and FIG. 5 are 2.0 and 1.0, respectively.

In each index, the median value correlates to the 50% value of themetabolic curve. An example of the metabolic curve for the Metabolicreserve index is shown in FIG. 6, the Metabolic alteration index in FIG.7, and the Allele Alteration Index in FIG. 8 and the Gene AlterationIndex in FIG. 9.

Ten individuals were chosen to demonstrate in detail the process toderive Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indices and metabolic rankingcalculations. See Table 3 for metabolic ranking calculation and Table 4for Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype index calculation. Table 3outlines the data used to calculate the rankings associated with eachdiscrete metabolic index value. In addition, the variable values used inthe metabolic ranking formula are outlined at the bottom of each indexcolumn. The variable value “x” denotes the variable index value for aparticular individual dependent on their Drug Metabolism ReservePhysiotype. The calculation of these index values is outlined in Table4. For each index, the values assigned to each allele in each gene areenumerated. The two allele values are separated with a semicolon (e.g.0.5; 1 for allele1; allele2). The sum of the allele values representsthe index value for that given genotype. That index value is thenassigned to the “x” variable in the metabolic ranking formula todetermine the relative metabolic position on the ranking curve. This canbe visualized by locating the index value on the X-axis of thedistribution represented in FIGS. 6-9 and noting the correspondinglocalization on the metabolic curve itself.

TABLE 3 Metabolic Reserve Metabolic Alteration Allele Alteration Gene Al

Index value N Ranking Index value N Ranking Index value N Ranking Indexvalue

2 1 0.00 0 49 0.04 0 49 0.04 0

2.5 6 0.01 0.5 79 0.15 1 201 0.26 1

3 15 0.03 1 170 0.37 2 203 0.61 2

3.5 23 0.06 1.5 118 0.62 3 95 0.87 3

4 61 0.13 2 84 0.79 4 28 0.97

4.5 84 0.26 2.5 39 0.90 5 1 1.00

5 156 0.46 3 27 0.96

5.5 96 0.68 3.5 10 0.99

6 84 0.84 4 1 1.00

6.5 37 0.94

7 14 0.99

RANKING EQUATION VARIABLES: j = 11 j = 9 j = 6 j =

x = index value x = index value x = index value x = inde

N = Array(N column) N = Array(N column) N = Array(N column) N = Array(

indicates data missing or illegible when filed

TABLE 4 Genotypes Metabolic Reserve Metabolic Alteration AlleleAlteration 2C9 2C19 2D6 C9 C19 D6 Sum Rank C9 C19 D6 Sum Rank C9 C19 D6Sum Rank

*2*3 *1*1 *1*1 0.5; 0  1; 1 1; 1 4.5 0.26 0.5; 1  0; 0 0; 0 1.5 0.62 1;1 0; 0 0; 0 2 0.61

*1*1 *1*1 *1*1 1; 1 1; 1 1; 1 6 0.84 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 0 0.04 0; 0 0; 0 0;0 0 0.04

*1*3 *1*2 *6*6 1; 0 1; 0 0; 0 2 0.00 0; 1 0; 1 1; 1 4 1.00 0; 1 0; 1 1;1 4 0.97

*1*1 *1*2 *10*2a 1; 1 1; 0 0.5; 1.5 5 0.46 0; 0 0; 1 0.5; 0.5 2 0.79 0;0 0; 1 1; 1 3 0.87

*1*1 *1*1 *1Dup*2a 1; 1 1; 1 1; 2 7 0.99 0; 0 0; 0 0; 1 1 0.37 0; 0 0; 00; 1 1 0.26

*1*2 *2*4 *17*2a  1; 0.5 0; 0 0.5; 1.5 3.5 0.06  0; 0.5 1; 1 0.5; 0.53.5 0.99 0; 1 1; 1 1; 1 5 1.00

*1*1 *2*2 *2a*2a 1; 1 0; 0 1.5; 1.5 5 0.46 0; 0 1; 1 0.5; 0.5 2 0.79 0;0 1; 1 1; 1 4 0.97

*1*3 *1*1 *1Dup*4 1; 0 1; 1 1; 0 4 0.13 0; 1 0; 0 0; 1 2 0.79 0; 1 0; 00; 1 2 0.61

*1*1 *1*1 *4*2 1; 1 1; 1 0; 1 5 0.46 0; 0 0; 0 1; 0 1 0.37 0; 0 0; 0 1;0 1 0.26

*1*3 *I*1 Del*4 1; 0 1; 1 0; 0 3 0.03 0; 1 0; 0 1; 1 3 0.96 0; 1 0; 0 1;1 3 0.87

indicates data missing or illegible when filed

Clinical Correlations of Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotypes EXAMPLE 2Clinical Correlation: LPH/IOL Vs. Cardiology

For purposes of comparison, a second cohort of 92 cardiovascularpatients treated with statins at Hartford Hospital was analyzed usingthe same four Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indices. Unlike theprimary population (N=577), which is comprised of 577 patients beingtreated for major depressive disorder (MDD) and/or other psychiatricconditions, this cohort consists of cardiology patients and thus acts asa suitable control population. In juxtaposing the metabolic indexhistograms of the two groups we find that these two cohorts havedistinct metabolic profiles. FIGS. 10-13 show these charts.

Metabolic Reserve Index:

When comparing the mean index value of the psychiatric and controlcohorts, it was found that the psychiatric population had a lowermetabolic reserve than the control group (5.05 vs. 5.25, p=0.073). Themedian ranking of the control group was similarly elevated at 47%compared to 43%. FIG. 10 depicts the overlay of the histograms for themetabolic reserve index. The cardiovascular cohort seems moreheterogeneous, with a smaller percentage of highly deficient individualsbut a greater proportion of ultra-rapid metabolizers.

Metabolic Alteration Index:

Similarly, the metabolic alteration index shows a trend towards agreater departure from WT metabolic phenotype for the psychiatricpopulation as compared to the control cohort (1.34 vs. 1.20, p=0.118).FIG. 11 again shows the control cohort to be more homogeneous, whilecontaining a greater fraction of the wild-type and mildly-deficientindividuals and less of the more severe metabolic phenotypes.

Allele Alteration Index:

In accordance with the results from the above comparison, patientstaking statins have less variant alleles than those taking psychiatricmedications (1.59 vs. 1.75, p=0.123). FIG. 12 shows that the moststriking differences are found, once again, in those individuals on theextremity of the curve, i.e. those with the greatest number of non-WTalleles.

Gene Alteration Index:

Analyzing the differences between the two groups at the level of genealteration reveals the most significant differences in the populations.Psychiatric patients have an average of 1.43 non-WT genes while controlpatients have an average of 1.26 non-WT genes; p=0.030. FIG. 13demonstrates that the psychiatric population has a lesser proportion ofpatients with 0-1 non-WT genes, but a greater fraction of individualswith 2-3 non-WT genes when compared with the cardiology control cohort.

The increased prevalence of drug metabolism alterations revealed by theDrug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indices in the psychiatric cohorthighlights its utility in elucidating inter-individual variation in thisparticular population. The purpose of the Drug Metabolism ReservePhysiotype indices is precisely to identify those individuals on theextremes of a normally distributed metabolic curve. FIGS. 10-13illustrate this phenomenon clearly; the trend-lines matching models tothe dataset reveal that the LPH-IOL cohort consistently has a greaterproportion of individuals on the extremities of each index, (with theexception of ultra-rapid metabolizers in the metabolic reserve index).The index and ranking system described herein, together, would provide aphysician with the absolute and relative placement of an individualpatient on the metabolic spectrum, guiding treatment decisions in thishighly variable genetic environment.

EXAMPLE 3 IOL Referred Outpatients Vs. Cardiology Control

A subset of the LPH/IOL cohort consists of 73 individuals evidencingsevere problems with drug therapy in a community, requiring referral toIOL. This group is distinct from the LPH/IOL population in that theirnegative response to psychotropic drug therapy was more severe than theaverage patient in the larger IOL/LPH cohort. They were referred to theLaboratory of Personalized health due to these increased adversereactions or lack of efficacy. In this cohort, the majority ofpsychiatric patients (57/73) were taking two or more psychotropicmedications at the time of the study.

In all cases, their average Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indexvalues depart from the control cohort's to a greater degree than thelarger IOL/LPH group. Regarding the Metabolic Reserve Index, theoutpatient cohort had an average reserve of 4.95 compared to 5.25 forthe cardiology control group (p=0.048). In the Metabolic AlterationIndex, the average alteration was 1.44 and 1.20 for the outpatient andcontrol groups, respectively (p=0.060). The psychiatric outpatientsubgroup has an average of 1.90 non wild-type alleles whereas thecontrol population has an average of 1.59 non wild-type alleles(p=0.048) corresponding to the Allele Alteration Index. Finally, theoutpatient group has 1.60 non wild-type genes on average, compared to amean value of 1.26 non wild-type genes for the control group (p=0.004).

FIG. 14 compares the distributions of the Gene Alteration Index betweenthe two cohorts (“Psych” refers to N=73 referred psychiatricoutpatients, “Cardiology” refers to N=92 cardiology control patients).The increased departure from the control cohort demonstrated by thegreater statistical significance when comparing the mean Drug MetabolismReserve Physiotype index values suggests that this subset of individualsevidencing severe problems with psychotropic drug therapy have greaterinnate drug metabolism deficiencies. This highlights an even greaterneed for Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype analysis and guidance forpatients referred to tertiary psychiatric hospitals.

EXAMPLE 4 Clinical Correlations of Psychiatric Cohort

The cohort consists of 150 consecutive, consenting admissions ages 20-81(median 43) 45% male, 55% female with a diagnosis of MDD and treatedwith psychotropic medications through the outpatient psychiatricservices at the Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital (CT, USA),admitted January-March, 2007. They were referred to the Laboratory ofPersonalized Health at Genomas, Inc (CT, USA) for diagnostic genotypingas part of their clinical care because of efficacy or safety problemsrelated to their medications. Self-reported ethnicities were 65%Caucasian, 28% Hispanic and 7% African-American. Data obtained includeddemographic, clinical and treatment information. Clinical data wasacquired through a questionnaire given to patients at the time ofenrollment. Treatment data was retrieved from paper and electronicmedical records as well as questionnaire responses. CYP450 genotypingdata were obtained for all 150 psychiatric patients on the CYP2C9,CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes.

Length of Hospitalization:

In comparing length of patient hospitalization with Drug MetabolismReserve Physiotype indices, important correlations and trends werefound, shown in Table 5. Those patients with a lower metabolic reserve(reserve index of 4 or less) had longer hospitalizations (7.7 vs. 6.1days, p=0.023). Furthermore, individuals with an metabolic alterationindex of 1.5 or less had an average length of hospitalization of 6.1days, compared to 7.0 days for patients with an index greater than 1.5(p=0.14). No significant correlation was found between length ofhospitalization and the allele alteration index. Finally, the patientsthat were carriers of 3 non-WT CYP450 genes had an average length ofstay of 9.6 days while the remainder of the patients had an averagehospitalization of 6.2 days (p=0.038). Covariance (correlation withp<0.15) was found with three variables; race, age and whether or not thepatient was taking an anti-psychotic. All correlations to DrugMetabolism Reserve Physiotype indices were calculated after correctingfor this covariance.

TABLE 5 Length of stay data represents values after correcting forcovariance. Average Length of Index Range Count HospitalizationSignificance Metabolic Reserve ≦4 26 7.7 p = 0.02 >4 119 6.1 MetabolicAlteration ≦1.5 104 6.1 p = 0.14 >1.5 41 7.0 Allele Alteration ≦2 1166.3 p = 0.70 >2 29 6.7 Gene Alteration ≦2 139 6.2 p = 0.04 >2 6 9.6

FIG. 15 depicts four physiogenomic plots that correlate length of staywith the four Drug Metabolism Reserve Physiotype indices. Plot 15a showsthat length of stay increases as metabolic capacity as measure by themetabolic reserve decreases. Plots 15b-5d demonstrate that greaterdeparture from wild-type alleles and genes leads to longerhospitalizations, however the relationship seen in 15c is notstatistically significant.

EXAMPLE 5 Drug Sensitivity Syndrome DSS

Based on the findings derived from comparisons to the control cohort andcorrelations with clinical variables, we have determined whichindividuals would qualify for categorization as harnessing a “DrugSensitivity Syndrome” (DSS). Evidence from the studies described hereinsuggest that those individuals who carry altered alleles (rapid,deficient or null polymorphisms) on each of the three CYP450 genes inconsideration represent the greatest departure from the controlpopulation and suffer the most severe clinical consequences.

Therefore we categorize the following: Drug Sensitivity Syndrome arisesin individuals whose Gene Alteration Index is equal to 3. There are 36individuals who carry polymorphisms in all three genes (6%). A detailedcategorization of the polymorphisms per gene and carrier status for DSSpatients is shown in Table 6.

Clinical symptoms associated with DSS as reported by physicians include“history of SSRI intolerance”, “unusual response to severalmedications”, and “multiple adverse drug reactions”. Those individualswho fall into these categories will require additional care when beingprescribed psychotropic medications due to their innate genetic drugmetabolism alterations. Such an alert and appropriate guidance will beprovided to the patient's physician and will include:

-   Patient's genotype for CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6-   Patient's metabolic profile based on Drug Metabolism Reserve    Physiotype indices, including both written and graphical information    to clarify the patient's absolute and relative drug metabolism    capacities.-   List of psychotropic drugs that are substrates of these three genes    with warnings associated with those drugs that are a substrate of a    gene for which the patient has a deficiency.

TABLE 6 Detailed representation of Drug Sensitivity Syndrome populationgenotypes Number of polymorphisms One each gene Two each gene N 2C9,2C19, 2D6 — 18 2C9, 2C19 2D6 16 2C9, 2D6 2C19  0 2C19, 2D6 2C9  1 2D62C9, 2C19  0 2C19 2C9, 2D6  0 2C9 2C19, 2D6  1 — 2C9, 2C19, 2D6  0 TOTAL36

A “phenotype” is a trait or collection of traits that is/are observablein an individual or population. The trait can be quantitative orqualitative.

A “polymorphism” is a locus that is variable; that is, within apopulation, the nucleotide sequence at a polymorphism has more than oneversion or allele. One example of a polymorphism is a “single nucleotidepolymorphism” (SNP), which is a polymorphism at a single nucleotideposition in a genome (the nucleotide at the specified position variesbetween individuals or populations).

A “locus” is a chromosomal position or region. For example, apolymorphic locus is a position or region where a polymorphic nucleicacid, trait determinant, gene or marker is located. A “gene locus” is aspecific chromosome location in the genome of a species where a specificgene can be found.

A “marker” refers to a nucleotide sequence or encoded product thereof(e.g., a protein) used as a point of reference when identifying a locusor a linked locus. A marker can be derived from genomic nucleotidesequence or from expressed nucleotide sequences (e.g., from an RNA, acDNA, etc.), or from an encoded polypeptide. The term also refers tonucleic acid sequences complementary to or flanking the markersequences, such as nucleic acids used as probes or primer pairs capableof amplifying the marker sequence.

A “gene” is one or more sequence(s) of nucleotides (that is apolynucleotide) in a genome that together encode one or more expressedmolecule, e.g., an RNA, or polypeptide. The gene can include codingsequences that are transcribed into RNA, which may then be translatedinto a polypeptide sequence, and can include associated structural orregulatory sequences that aid in replication or expression of the gene.

A “set” of markers or probes refers to a collection or group of markersor probes, or the data derived therefrom, used for a common purpose,e.g., identifying an individual with a specified phenotype. Frequently,data corresponding to the markers or probes, or derived from their use,is stored in an electronic medium. While each of the members of a setpossess utility with respect to the specified purpose, individualmarkers selected from the set as well as subsets including some, but notall of the markers, are also effective in achieving the specifiedpurpose.

The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in thecontext of describing the invention (especially in the context of thefollowing claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and theplural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted bycontext. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing”are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, butnot limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of valuesherein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referringindividually to each separate value falling within the range, unlessotherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated intothe specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methodsdescribed herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwiseindicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The useof any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”)provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the inventionand does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unlessotherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construedas indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice ofthe invention.

Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, includingthe best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention.Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to thoseof ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. Theinventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations asappropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practicedotherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, thisinvention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subjectmatter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicablelaw. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in allpossible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unlessotherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

1. A method of treating a human psychiatric patient, the methodcomprising genotyping the human psychiatric patient to produce acombinatorial genotype for the human psychiatric patient, wherein thecombinatorial genotype is produced using allele specific primerextension with primers that detect all of the polymorphisms in CYP2C9,CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 according to Table 1 and detecting both alleles ofthe human psychiatric patient for all of the polymorphisms in CYP2C9,CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 according to Table 1, wherein the alleles detectedcomprise the polymorphisms in CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 according toTable 1; TABLE 1 Gene Allele Nucleotide Change CYP2C9 *1 None *2 430C >T *3 1075A > C *4 1076T > C *5 1080C > G *6 818delA CYP2C19 *1 None *2681G > A *3 636G > A *4 1A > G *5 1297C > T *6 395G > A *7 IVS5 + 2T > A*8 358T > C CYP2D6 *1 None *1XN Gene copy number (N) *2 1661G > C *2a-1584C > G *2XN Gene copy number (N) *3 2549delA *4 1846G > A *4XN Genecopy number (N) *5 Gene deletion *6 1707delT *7 2935A > C *8 1758G > T*9 2615 2617delAAG *10 100C > T *11 883G > C *12 124G > A *14 1758G > A*15 137_138InsT *17 1023C > T *41 2988G > A

calculating one or more index scores of a Drug Metabolism ReservePhysiotype selected from the group consisting of a metabolic reserveindex score, a metabolic alteration index score, an allele alterationindex score and a gene alteration index score, based on Table 2, whereinthe metabolic reserve index is scored 0, 0.5, 1.5 or 2.0, the metabolicalteration index is scored 0, 0.5 or 1.0, the allele alteration index isscored 0 or 1 for each copy of each allele individually according toTable 2, and the gene alteration index is scored 0 or 1 based on thecombination of alleles according to Table 2, and all scores are added toproduce, respectively, the metabolic reserve index score, the metabolicalteration index score, the allele alteration index score and/or thegene alteration index score; and TABLE 2 CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6 (SEQ ID(SEQ ID (SEQ ID Metabolic Metabolic Allele NO: 1) NO: 2) NO: 3) ReserveAlteration Alteration *1 *1 *1, *2 1.0 0 0 *2 *9, *10, 0.5 0.5 1 *17,*41 *2a 1.5 0.5 1 *1XN, 2.0 1.0 1 *2XN *3, *4, *5, *2, *3, *4, *3, *4,*6, 0 1.0 1 *6 *5, *6, *7, *7, *8, *11, *8 *12, *14, *15, *5, *4XN GeneCYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6 Alteration *1*1 *1*1 *1*1, *1*2, 0 *2*2 All otherAll other All other 1 allele allele allele combina- combina- combina-tions tions tions

comparing the one or more index scores for the human psychiatric patientto the distribution of the same index scores for the human population todetermine the index score of the psychiatric patient relative to thepopulation.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising administering adrug regimen to the patient based upon the index score of thepsychiatric patient relative to the population.
 3. The method of claim1, wherein the patient has been diagnosed with depression.
 4. The methodof claim 3, wherein the patient is a patient with major depressivedisorder.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the patient with majordepressive disorder has been hospitalized for the major depressivedisorder.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising correlating theone or more index scores for the individual with a predicted length ofhospitalization.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprisingcustomizing a drug regimen for the patient to reduce a length ofhospitalization or reduce a risk of re-hospitalization.
 8. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the index score is for the allele alteration index. 9.The method of claim 8, wherein the allele alteration index score isgreater than or equal to 3 and the individual is diagnosed with DrugSensitivity Syndrome.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein theantidepressant or stimulant is a substrate of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6.11. The method of claim 1, wherein the population is a controlpopulation of non-psychiatrically ill patients or a psychiatric patientpopulation.
 12. A method of determining if a human psychiatric patienthas Drug Sensitivity Syndrome, the method comprising genotyping thehuman psychiatric patient to produce a combinatorial genotype for thehuman psychiatric patient, wherein the combinatorial genotype isproduced using allele specific primer extension with primers that detectall of the polymorphisms in CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 according toTable 1 and detecting both alleles of the human psychiatric patient forall of the polymorphisms in CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 according toTable 1, wherein the alleles detected comprise the polymorphisms inCYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 according to Table 1: TABLE 1 Gene AlleleNucleotide Change CYP2C9 *1 None *2 430C > T *3 1075A > C *4 1076T > C*5 1080C > G *6 818delA CYP2C19 *1 None *2 681G > A *3 636G > A *4 1A >G *5 1297C > T *6 395G > A *7 IVS5 + 2T > A *8 358T > C CYP2D6 *1 None*1XN Gene copy number (N) *2 1661G > C *2a −1584C > G *2XN Gene copynumber (N) *3 2549delA *4 1846G > A *4XN Gene copy number (N) *5 Genedeletion *6 1707delT *7 2935A > C *8 1758G > T *9 2615 2617delAAG *10100C > T *11 883G > C *12 124G > A *14 1758G > A *15 137_138InsT *171023C > T *41 2988G > A

calculating the gene alteration index score wherein the gene alterationis scored by assigning 1 or 2 for each gene according to Table 2, andall scores are added to produce the gene alteration index score of thehuman psychiatric patient; and TABLE 2 Gene CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6Alteration *1*1 *1*1 *1*1, *1*2, *2*2 0 All other allele All otherallele All other allele 1 combinations combinations combinations

wherein the gene alteration index score is equal to 3 and the individualis diagnosed with Drug Sensitivity Syndrome.
 13. The method of claim 12,further comprising, and administering a drug regimen to the patientbased upon the index score of the psychiatric patient relative to thepopulation.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the patient has beendiagnosed with depression.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein thepatient is a patient with major depressive disorder.
 16. The method ofclaim 15, wherein the patient with major depressive disorder has beenhospitalized for the major depressive disorder.